Skip to main content
Laura Kuenssberg’s Inside Story Brexit Storm - Hero

The Brexit Storm

Laura Kuenssberg’s inside story.

About the programme

Filmed over nine tumultuous months, the BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg takes us inside every twist and turn of the most extraordinary political story of our time - Brexit.

Cameras go behind the scenes to follow the political players and Laura as she reports on exceptional events. The film covers Theresa May's doomed efforts to secure backing for her Chequers plan, cabinet resignations and backbench plots. We also see leadership challenges and historic parliamentary defeats, as well as a national campaign for a second referendum which causes splits within parties.

With Westminster in crisis and Theresa May grappling to get her deal through, this film reveals the country's most influential parliamentarians as they battle to secure the future they want for Britain - in or out of the EU.

This one-hour special takes the viewer into the centre of the Brexit storm in a highly charged and emotional battle for political victory.

Read more about the documentary on the BBC's programme page .

Discover the range of qualifications and modules from the OU related to this programme:

Theresa May in Poland, 2016

Why ‘No Deal is better than a Bad Deal’ couldn’t fly

The unmanageable cost of leaving without a Withdrawal Agreement helped the EU impose one that few would ever like.

To secure a Withdrawal Agreement on better terms that those assigned to Norway and Turkey on the edge of the EU (or Switzerland within it), the UK had to ensure that “No Deal is better than a Bad Deal ”. Brexiteers who regarded Theresa May’s deal as a betrayal of their 2016 vision, or endorsed it only with humble apologies  when all other exits seemed blocked, will always believe that a chance was missed by failing to put credible No Deal plans in place.

Stark warnings from industry about shortages of medicines and essential food, and difficulty lining up extra cross-Channel ships , gave EU negotiators a clear impression that the UK was unprepared for leaving without a deal - even after the emphatic first defeat of Theresa May’s proposals  in January 2019. That hardened Brussels’ stance, ensuring that a Deal which fell short of May’s original demands  could be brought back twice to Parliament, with opposition subsiding as MPs realised the only other way out was a cliff and not a lift. 

In too deep

Theresa May and Jean Claude Juncker

Theresa May and Jean Claude Juncker - CC0

While critics accuse them of losing the No Deal weapon through half-hearted preparation, ministers and civil servants soon found that keeping No Deal credible was a Herculean task. So much UK export and import flows through Dover and Calais that just a few extra minutes, for additional inspections or paperwork checks, would soon turn motorways into lorry parks .

UK supply chains are now so intertwined with those of the EU that any divergence, from the Customs Union’s uniform tariffs or the Single market’s common standards, can impose significant extra cost . Just-in-time production has spread so far, on the basis of frictionless trade with the rest of Europe, that the UK does not have sufficient warehouse space for the stockpiles  that could build up before or after a ‘No Deal’ departure.  

While Brexiteers maintained that the UK without a Withdrawal Agreement could trade on World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules, questions were raised from the start about how much protection these offered. Agriculture, food, vulnerable industries and services (making up over 70% of national output) are not covered  by the WTO fall-back. Without its own WTO schedule, some legal experts have denied that the UK could switch to WTO rules immediately , pointing to ongoing negotiations that might take another seven years.


Too costly a contingency

Theresa May and Angela Merkel meet and shake hands

Theresa May and Angela Merkel

To make it an effective threat, the UK did not need to shield itself from all possible No Deal disruptions. It only had to ensure that departure without a deal would inflict more pain on the rest of Europe than on itself. Brexiteers often invoked Germany’s carmakers , trusting them to twist their own government’s arm to ensure a clear route to their UK outsources. But the likely damage to Ireland , whose trade with the EU largely runs through the UK, seemed an even bigger reason for Brussels to yield to UK demands.

In practice, the belief that No Deal damage would be concentrated on Ireland was never enough to soften EU negotiators’ stance, since Northern Ireland stood to lose even more , in terms of social and political stability as well the economy. And the EU is at least as well placed to channel emergency help to Ireland as was the UK to Northern Ireland, to which it had already slipped an extra £1bn to secure Democratic Unionist support for May’s Westminster government.

Fundamentally, making ‘No Deal’ credible confronted the UK with the problem always faced by those preparing for war in pursuit of peace. It meant investing large sums (and asking industry to do the same) that would entirely go to waste if preparations were successful. Britain’s coastal castles and nuclear bunkers , having not come under attack, at least bring tourism and architectural interest.

The costs of giant lorry parks and refrigerators are harder to recover. That made the Treasury reluctant to incur them; and when it finally began to commit large funds to Brexit preparation in 2018 , they arrived too late for most departments to assign them effectively.


Bargaining without power

Brexit - EU and Union Jack flyers

Brexiteers blame opposition parties and employers’ organisations , as well as the government itself, for ruining the chance of a ‘clean break’ by taking the No Deal option off the table. But when the CBI and TUC joined forces to campaign against No Deal , they were reflecting a widespread view – among those who actually comprise the economy – that 45 years of eliminating tariffs and non-tariff barriers from cross-Channel trade could not be suddenly scrapped without horrendous cost.


Meet the OU experts

Dr Peter WoodVisiting Fellow with The Open University's Geography DisciplineVIEW FULL PROFILE
Dr Peter WoodVisiting Fellow with The Open University's Geography Discipline

Peter is a Visiting Fellow with The Open University's Geography Discipline. He is also a postgraduate Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society (RGS) with the Institute of British Geographers (IBG).

His research interests focus on sustainability, community organising and mobility. Working closely with local authorities and sustainable transport charities, his work has focused on how different ways of travelling affect the lives of people in South London.

Alan Shipman, The Open University
Alan ShipmanSenior Lecturer - Economics, Art & Social SciencesVIEW FULL PROFILE
Alan Shipman, The Open University
Alan ShipmanSenior Lecturer - Economics, Art & Social Sciences

I'm focused on macro-economics, especially how it interacts with political power - with an interest in the impact of the original (‘1992’) Single Market programme, industrial supply chains, and the recent ‘global value chain’ research which links company and industry studies with macro-level trade analysis. 

Author of The New Power Elite, a study of how elites exploit and manage social divisions to settle their own top-table disputes.

I'm involved in course design at all levels, usually trying to put more macro-economics into the curriculum, and finding ways to combine economics with other social sciences for joint degrees (especially Politics, Philosophy and Economics, for which he is Qualification Lead.

More on Europe and foreign affairs...

Inside the Foreign Office

There’s never been a more significant time to look behind the scenes. 

Read Article
Jeremy Paxman outside of Berlaymont

Paxman in Brussels: Who really rules us?

In this one-off programme on BBC 1, Jeremy Paxman asks whether we have given the power to rule us to Europe, and if we have does it matter?

Read Article
Ed Balls with miners in Poland

Travels in Euroland with Ed Balls

Ed Balls explores national identity and the rise of right-wing populism across Europe. 

Read Article
President Donald Trump and VP Mike Pence

Trump Takes on the World

Donald Trump’s top advisers and the leaders who clashed with him lift the lid on the critical moments of his foreign policy.

Read Article

Explore the OU

A cropped photo of students with documents scattered in front of them.

Open University courses

An image of the OU poster for 'A Perfect Planet'

Order a free OU Poster

A young woman on a computer in a cafe

OU subjects A-Z

A photograph taken in a cafe. A mug is in focus in the foreground, and a man using a laptop is out of focus in the background.

The latest OU news

A photo of a person using a laptop and notebook, and a small dog resting its head on the user's arm

About distance learning

A top-down picture of a man using a laptop at a desk

Free courses

A photo of a man wearing a red hoodie and headphones walking away from the camera, on a busy path by a road

Hear from students

About our BBC partnership

For over 50 years The Open University and the BBC have worked together; co-producing hundreds of hours of programming and bringing learning to life for millions. Find out more about our unique partnership.

OU website